Site Admin: Your first sentence presupposes that you know exactly what happened. You say they made a terrible mistake. Can you provide evidence of this terrible mistake please? If not then you are just as guilty of the same faults you accuse others of. “Extremely unlikely” is not “impossible” is it? Since when were crimes like this “extremely likely”? What does education, status or their campaigning for Amber Alert have to do with their innocence or guilt? Answer: NOTHING.

So what if they went on a tour to campaign for awareness of other missing children. That does not remove them being the last people to see Madeleine alive (by their own admission) and statistically it does not diminish the chance that they were guilty of harming Madeleine because the math doesn’t lie. What has being “elegant” and having 2 other kids to consider got to do with anything? In April 2007 she had 3 kids to consider. What a pity she didn’t consider the oldest of the 3 kids eh?

Do you live at the McCanns’ home per chance? If not, how do you know they are grieving? We’ve all seen them laughing and joking on many photos and videos. Gerry was laughing and joking a few days after Madeleine was reported missing and the pair of them were laughing and joking as they left the church on what would have been Madeleine’s 4th birthday. That doesn’t look like grieving.

If it were my child who was really missing, I would have participated in a re-enactment of the alibis. I would have helped the police in every way possible. The McCanns haven’t. They dodged a re-enactment with petty excuses. Gerry McCann sat in on Kate’s interview on May 4 when as we all know, he should have been interviewed totally separately. Why did they prevent the police from examining Madeleine’s medical records and the parent’s financial information? The British police claim that Gerry has no record of having credit cards. That’s strange because in his blog he claims they were stolen when his wallet was stolen! He also rented a car and we have the last 4 digits of his credit card on the rental agreement – also in the police file. Why then the secrecy with the McCanns’ financial information?

To answer another one of your questions, NO – I would not be bothered about the media ahead of helping the police. The police are going to find the girl – not the media.

Contrary to what you think and say, we all have the right to think and say whatever we want – that’s what a free country means. In this website we say the McCanns had something to do with the disappearance of their daughter Madeleine and two-thirds of the population also believe that. Therefore we can think and say what we like.

Finally, I don’t know of anyone basing their judgement on hearsay. The facts are all there. Did you not read the police file? Do you not realise that the police investigated this as a homicide with a staged abduction? That is truth and fact – not hearsay.

Site admin: Absolute nonsense! The McCanns have never been seen looking for their first born child. Of course they are making profits – look at their accounts and see the corporation tax they have paid. Tax is only paid on profits! In 2007 they paid over £37,000 for a website that would cost under £1000 at commercial rates. Who got the other £36,000? People do not generally deal with things differently because, after all, we are all humans and therefore we do the same things as each other. We grieve, we laugh, we cry etc. “Innocent until proven guilty” only means “in the eyes of the law”, it doesn’t mean you really are innocent. The Yorkshire Ripper was “innocent” on the same basis until the jury found him guilty but obviously he wasn’t ever “innocent” because he had butchered many women in a long period of time. Even after he confessed that he was the Ripper after his arrest, he was still legally “innocent”. He only became guilty after the verdict was issued by the court. There is always a period of time between a crime being committed and a guilty verdict where a person is deemed “innocent”. It doesn’t mean they really are innocent though.

One very important part of an investigation into the disappearance of a child requires that the parents provide police with all the help they can in establishing beyond doubt that the child was indeed abducted. From what we know of the initial police investigation with sniffer dogs and also further investigation with the cadaver dog Eddie and the crime scene (blood detection) dog Kayla, all the evidence seems to point to Madeleine’s death in the holiday apartment and cover up by the parents and possibly their friends. They seem to have interfered negatively in the investigation rather than helped.

My strong belief lies in the theory I read elsewhere that the McCanns appear to have wanted to avoid an autopsy on Madeleine’s body at any cost. Are they still allowed to administer medical treatment to their remaining children? That I believe would be scandalous. As for the apparent interference in this case by politicians in high places, do these politicians past or present, understand the meaning of the Westminster Convention of the Separation of Powers in that the executive government who legislate, are not allowed to interfere in the judicial process at any stage??? I would have thought that the initial stages of a police investigation are part of that process. British police were dispatched to Portugal to look at the evidence. To overlook evidence from the initial investigation and simply accept without doubt the word of the parents that the child was abducted
regardless of any evidence to the contrary, appears to me to be a miscarriage of justice.

Site Admin: It certainly was a gross miscarriage of justice. Also, don’t forget the abysmal way in which the witnesses were interviewed in England in April 2008 at Leicestershire Constabulary. Those interviews are a complete farce. The Tapas 7 witnesses were virtually directed in what they should say. People were on first name terms with the police, there were hundreds of bogus sightings and the information from the Gaspar statements was deliberately withheld from the PJ for almost 6 months. Regarding sightings, let’s face it – people still claim to see Elvis and Lord Lucan. Whether Madeleine died or not, there will always be people wasting police time on “sightings”.

The McCanns are bare faced liars and if they were in the USA, I feel sure a Grand Jury would have indicted them a long time ago.

The book is all poor me and why don;t I shop at aldi when people see me shopping in M/S wake up kate…. everyone want poor maddie to be found safe and well and I cannot begin to imagin what I would do if I lost my children or grandchildren, I brought two children up from been 1 and three on my own worked full time but I did not ever leave the alone for a single second.

What you did can not be accpptable ever, stop pointing the finger to everyone but your self because this is what you do look after you as you did on the sad and terrible night, was you so fed up of looking after your children where they too much trouble??? Tell me Kate if a perent had left there children and had them taken away from them as a GP what would you say to them?????? Yes they should never of left their children alone. same goes for you too. You are selfish, and playing the victim, sadly it was Maddie who has suffered as a result of you selfishness and not you !!! I hope you find your daughter safe and well, But don’t think this will ever happen do you???